Once Andy lau and famous chase crazy fans in almost has been sci forgotten time for a lawsuit returned to public view. She MouBao reputation infringement nba jerseys lawsuit guangzhou south's recently in guangzhou intermediate people's court sentenced the sci losing. The court said that, sci and their parents contacted actively, accept many times many media interviews, belong to the "voluntary type public figures", nature derives the public's right to know. South MouBao sci and his family to reports of sci family is indeed involved the privacy, but the privacy and social the public's social event in contact, as part of the natural public interest, because this report for possible minor damage, sci also shall stand. According to the logic of the court, if "many active contact, accept many media interview, should belong to" voluntary type public figure ". But for sci and their families, is a voluntary, but he is not always a "public figures". Because a public person, whether in politics, or the entertainment, or in any other industry, all from the public awareness of widely enjoy benefit, at least in trying to get the benefits of subjective. I don't know and his family from the sci their popularity what they have, in addition to the destruction of "innings, but this is not the interests. The court only from the "many active contact, accept many media interview, sci and concludes that family is public figures, obviously for the definition of public figures is too general. And the sci said is "voluntary type public figures", as in a perversion of the court in a "be voluntary type public figure". And the group performed, bright red, famous and benefit proportional to the public figures, compared to its obviously hasn't tolerate sci privacy damage obligations. Step back MLB Cap for ten thousand, sci even if is the so-called "voluntary type public figures", so their privacy can be any violations? There is a very popular saying, now even has increased to justice tendency, namely public figures in the extensive attention from society have benefited, in return, their privacy can not be protected public has infinite know affection rights. After all, there should be no celebrity what privacy, guangzhou intermediate people's court for judgment in cases of sci seems to confirm that. First have to admit, and public figures for some the exercise of rights is really more normal restrictions, such as the maintenance of privacy. But the restrictions is not random, the premise is these rights and public interest conflict.