Hubei honghu municipal government websites
appear a case, it HongHuShi relevant departments apply for branch reporter?
Expenses? $40000 xinhua news agency's apology. This paper says: "during
the interview, the xinhua news agency hubei
branch reporter ask for the settlement board and lodging expenses, be our
ministry declined. The end of the interview, the actual reception cost is
7402.52 yuan", "the xinhua news agency in hubei NFL hats branch reporter for
reception, along with all the other reporter receive funds for solving the
practices, the damage the xinhua news agency xinhua news agency of hubei branch
and the whole image, caused the bad influence in society." The adjoining
zigui county of hubei province recently received similar
XunShiZu 6. All their followers had is relying on the name of the reception,
"pack" solve other cost: adjoining zigui county identified as "XunShiZu
name to submit an expense account other expenses", is time? Expenses?
$114451, far less than 800000 yuan; And HongHuShi of the relevant departments
of the same is far lower than the actual? Expenses? For 40000 yuan, of which,
along with all the other because the difference between the application and
produce? Expenses?. Is the need for maintenance of their followers had
credibility, should MingYuan. These are all office units or their followers had
department, maintain good image and credibility is its existence and efficient
work foundation. When they were the reception of the actual reception level is
far lower than the nets and the cost of reception, its reputation and
credibility is "back" a "big blame". Face and the image is
wiped, ordinary people have should borrow legal relief approaches such as
protection of their reputation, office unit should be even more through the
judicial and administrative way want to restore the reputation, to restore
their own credibility with the public acceptance. In addition, in order to give
the public a clear statement, implement taxpayers for official business?
Expenses? 'right to know their followers had also should be out on the
situation. When together as a public official entertaining extensive attention
of the topic, it actually has become a matter of public interest public events.
Face the public events, even if it is the private enterprise is their followers
had representatives or big star, should stand up to the public a claim. Why
when some office unit or departments involved in "luxury business
entertain" after rumors, but don't stand up to Discount sunglasses the social public explained
the situation? Can't always let those who are "extravagant official
entertaining rumours" that the damage was silent. In emotion in principle,
the once involved in official entertaining topic, they are not
"right". Based on the author's opinion, the relevant departments
should be questioning those "take" of their followers had was, so
that they can be also a sense of justice, also can give the public a clear
statement.