The supreme law: two up drunk driving case the defendant was sentenced to life in order "are think:" SunWeiMing long-term driving without a license, violate the traffic regulations, in many times drunken driving and other rear-end collision, for escape to continue driving overrun the speed, and has four cars driving in a normal car collided, killing four people and 1 people injured. The people's court, the defendant and the defendant that LiJingQuan SunWeiMing drunk driving after has the traffic accident, continue to hit the road, driving rushed so that caused many deaths of serious MLB Cap consequences, and its harm to others the subjective casualties results with attitude, has obvious indulge harm the public safety intent ". And then further pointed out that "drunk driving indulge harm the happening of the consequences are deadly form, in a dangerous means to endanger public security sin according to article one hundred and fifteen of the criminal law, the provisions of the first paragraph should place, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 10 years, life imprisonment or death". Such logic, marvel enough. Legal common sense tells us, in a dangerous means to endanger public security sin is a "dangerous prisoners", as long as the actor's behavior is enough to cause some damage occurred the perilous state of the, even if has not yet occurred serious consequences, and also constitute a crime accomplishment. The Supreme Court was that, in a dangerous means to endanger public security not only sin is not "dangerous crimes," and not "too results make", but "harm result" as the problems about the crime. Visible, the Supreme Court to cater to most people's violent habit, and stretches the law, optional qualitative. Driving in a dangerous behavior if a method to endanger public safety sin, general is as a vehicle to endanger public security tools, not as a transportation tools. SunWeiMing driving escape, no more than is to escape the nba jerseys responsibility of car tracing cauda, how can indulge others with their death? If the Supreme Court so qualitative no problem, then to buy traffice offences to where? If because traffice offences sentencing is lighter, should also through a change in the law of the right way to make up for, and can't take the law "ShangXiaJiShou" measures to solve the problem. Look, the Supreme Court has "crazy".